PDA

View Full Version : Origin of Bosniaks


domagoj
22 Mar 2009, 21:08
A thread to present your theories and opinions without the fear of getting flamed by nationalistic assholes.


The aim of this article is to indicate deep connections between the Croats and Muslim Bosniaks (= Bosnjaci - Muslimani). In order to avoid misunderstanding we shall rather use their descriptional name - Muslim Slavs. The reason is that the Croats in Bosnia are also Bosniaks. Indeed, many of them bear Bosniak as their second name. The meaning of Bosniak is simply - a Bosnian.

In the Zagreb telephone book only (1994/95) you can see a long list of as many as 210 surnames of Bosnjak, with only one Muslim forename, and also more than 30 Bosnjakovic's, with only 3 Muslim forenames.

There is village Bosnjaci in Croatia (4,500 inhabitants prior to 1991, near Zupanja). I did not find any village of a similar name on a map of Bosnia. Also in Hrvatsko Zagorje, near Zagreb, there is a

* small village of Bosna, then
* Bosanci near Bosiljevo and Bjelovar,
* Bosnici near Dreznica and Kijevo,
* Bosanka (that is, Bosnian Woman!) near the famous city of Dubrovnik,
* and two small regions of Bosna near Vrbovac and D. Stupnik.

There is also a village of Mala Bosna (that is, Small Bosnia) near the city of Subotica.

One can find Croatian families bearing the Turkish second name of Ulama even in the NW of Croatia (Hrvatsko Zagorje). The town of Tuhelj in Hrvatsko Zagorje was given by those Croats who had to escape from the region of the village of Tuhelj in Bosnia, between Kresevo and Konjic, see [Gizdelin, pp 44, 53]. Near Varazdin Breg there is a village of Turcin (= The Turk).

Vranduk in 1910.Let us start by describing many traces left by the Turkish Ottoman Empire. This civilization, that was present on Croatian soil from the 15th to the 19th century (in eastern parts of former Yugoslavia until the beginning of the 20th century), left a deep imprint. Many Croats converted to Islam. The Muslim Slavs are in great majority of Croatian descent, and constitute now a nation, recognized according to their own wish in 1968 (Muslimani has been the usual name since the beginning of the 20th century). Except in Croatia they live today mostly in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Sandzak (a province in the south of Serbia, between Montenegro, Kosovo and Bosnia).

There were many disputes even about the name of "Muslimani", which was defined to have only the national content (i.e. one could have been Musliman without being religious at all, as was the case for example with Raif Dizdarevic, former president of former Yugoslavia; of course, his predecessors were Muslims). On the other hand the term "musliman" (with small m) had the meaning of Muslim exclusively in the religious sense. The way out was to choose an old geographical name Bosniak, which traditionally denoted any citizen of Bosnia - either Croat (as we said, many of them have Bosniak as a surname), or Muslim, or Serb. It is strange that this usurpation of the name of Bosniak has been accepted even in the official Croatia. From this easily follows a complete usurpation of the Bosnian name (usurpation of Bosnian literature, language and of the entire history of Bosnia). Of course, we do not deny the right of Muslim - Bosniaks to call themselves Bosniaks. We would like to indicate that the name of Bosniaks does not refer exclusively to Bosnian Muslims, but to Bosnian Croats too.


I recommend the interested reader to consult BEHAR, the journal of the Cultural society of Bosniaks (more precisely: Bosniaks - Muslims) in Zagreb called Preporod, for their views on these very sensitive questions, especially an article by Esad Cimic in No22-23, p.12-15, 1996. The society unites outstanding Muslim intellectuals in Croatia. ``Behar'' was founded in 1900 - its first editor in chief had been Safvet-beg Basagic. It was forbidden during the 70 years' ex-Yugoslav period.

Even the historical names of many officials in the Ottoman Empire reveal their origin (Hirwat = Hrvat or Horvat, which is a Croatian name for Croat): Mahmut-pasa Hirwat (= Hrvat), Rusten-pasa Hrvat, Pijali-pasa Hrvat, Sijavus-pasa Hrvat etc. In the 16th century a traveler and writer Marco A. Pigaffetta wrote that almost everybody on the Turkish court in Constantinople knows the Croatian language, and especially soldiers. Marco Pigafetta in his "Itinerario'' published in London in 1585 states: "In Istanbul it is customary to speak Croatian, a language which is understood by almost all official Turks, especially military men."

This can also be confirmed by the 1553 visit of Antun Vrancic, Roman cardinal, and Franjo Zay, a diplomat, to Istanbul as envoys of the Croat - Hungarian king to discuss a peace treaty with the Turks. During the initial ceremonial greetings they had with Rustem - pasha Hrvat (= Croat) the conversation led in Turkish with an official interpreter was suddenly interrupted. Rustem - pasha Hrvat asked in Croatian if Zay and Vrancic spoke Croatian language. The interpreter was then dismissed and they proceeded in the Croatian language during the entire process of negotiations.


Croatian song in Arabica Arabica alphabet One of the oldest texts written in Arabica (which is in fact Arabic script for the Croatian language) is a love song called "Chirvat-türkisi" (= Croatian song) from 1588, written by a certain Mehmed in Bosnia. This manuscript is held in the National Library in Vienna. Except for literature Arabica was also used in religious schools and administration. Of course, it was in much lesser use than other scripts. The last book in Arabica was printed in 1941.

Many of the Muslim Slavs in Bosnia-Herzegovina had a strong awareness of their Croatian descent, and even called themselves Muslim Croats, to distinguish from the Catholic Croats. Some of the most outstanding Croatian writers and intellectuals of the Muslim faith in Bosnia and Herzegovina are:

* Edhem Mulabdic (1862-1954),
* Adenaga Mesic (1868-1945),
* Ivan Aziz Milicevic (1868-1950),
* Safvet-beg Basagic (1870-1934),
* Osman Nuri Hadzic (1869-1937),
* Hasan Fehim Nametak (1871-1953),
* Fehim Spaho (1877-1942),
* Musa Cazim Catic (1878-1915),
* Dzafer-beg Kulenovic (1891-1956),
* Ahmed Muradbegovic (1898-1972),
* Hasan Kikic (1905-1942),
* Hamdija Kresevljakovic (1898-1959)
* Alija Nametak (1906-1987),
* Nahir Kulenovic (1929-1963),
* Enver Colakovic (1913-1976),
* Mehmedalija Mak Dizdar (1917-1971)
* Muhamed Hadzijahic (1918-1978)
* Asaf Durakovic (1940)
* Ekrem Spahic (1945)

etc. Anybody wishing to study the history of Islamic culture in Bosnia-Herzegovina seriously should consult numerous works of Hamdija Kresevljakovic (1888-1959), an outstanding Muslim Croat, member of the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts in Zagreb, author of an important monograph about history of Croatian literature in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Biographies of important Muslim Croats can be found in his ``Kratak pregled hrvatske knjige u Herceg - Bosni'' (A short survey of Croatian literature in Herzeg - Bosnia) printed in Sarajevo in 1912. For more information see [Karihman]. It should be noted that the literary and scientific activity of such intellectuals has been severely suppressed during the 70 years' Yugoslav period, resulting that today a very small percentage of the entire Muslim Slav population in BiH and Croatia has the awareness of its Croatian roots.

Additional information:

* Mato Marcinko: Hrvati islamske vjere

Salon de Paris - Kristian Krekovic, 1925 Une vue de Bosnie: Stare bosanske kuce, 1925We can document the equivalence of the name of Bosniak and Hrvat during many centuries, until the Yugoslav period (see below). It seems that the final and almost complete national individualization of Muslim Slavs took place only during the tragedy they experienced during the Serbian large-scale aggression on Bosnia and Herzegovina in the period of 1992-95 (the aggression against BiH started already in October 1991 by the slaughter of the Croats in the Herzegovinian village of Ravno). This aggression found Muslim officials totally unprepared. Moreover, when Vukovar and the whole of Croatia were bleeding, being systematically destroyed in the second half of 1991, president Izetbegovic declared "This is not our war'', believing naively that the Yugoslav Army and armed extremists would not dare to do the same in Bosnia - Hercegovina. Of course, the national individualization was strengthened also during the tragic conflict with the Croats in 1993, which was one of the well prepared results of the Serbian aggression.

The equivalence of the name of Bosniak and Croat in the early period of the Ottoman occupation of Bosnia is documented by the famous Turkish historian Aali (1542-1599) in his work Knhulahbar, also known as Tarihi Aali. He gave the following description of the properties of Croatian tribe (as he calls it) in Bosnia:

As regards the tribe of the Croats, which is assigned to the river Bosna, their character is reflected in their cheerful mood; throughout Bosnia they are also known according to that river... [i.e. Croats = Bosniaks i.e. Bosnians].

Bulgaroktonos
22 Mar 2009, 22:17
Very well researched. Where did you get all this information ? I never knew about the conections between Catholic and Muslim Croats (didn't even know that Muslim Croats exist). But I didn't get where is the theory. I think this is just history as it should be !?

domagoj
22 Mar 2009, 22:26
Yep.But in wikipedia it says otherwise-the conqueror writes the history.
Sources vary.Books,tales of my grandma which she heard from her grand-grandma which was born in Austro-Hungaria etc...

Also,very few Bosniaks are aware of the Croatian descent,others get insulted by even mentioning it-they have every right to be a nation,just,they should not fake history and invent things.

Bulgaroktonos
22 Mar 2009, 22:54
I think it's absolutely clear that the muslim bosnians must have been christians sometimes before but traited their faith.

Why should the bosnians be conquerors ? They were conquered like their neighbours.

Whow this seems to be a family-intern issue of great importance. Where do you live now ?

domagoj
22 Mar 2009, 23:07
Croatia,Osijek,also,there were not Bosnians,but Croatians,as Bosnia was the core of the Croatian state at that time.Alas,the Bosnians arent the conquerors but Ottomans are.Bosnians have been exposed to heavy turkicization.In the 20th century after WW1 Bosniaks became aware of their descent but to no avail.Partisan victory saw the revival of the parting of Croats and Bosniaks.

elvain
23 Mar 2009, 01:51
I would prefer not to comment this. But I was asked to say my opinion about this - I have no idea why. I don't feel competent to present my theory about something I don!t have detailed information.

But I was asked to state what I think. So here you go:

I don't think it is important what is one's genetic or other descent. National identity is very dynamic thing and can change. That Hungarians are mostly of Slavic origin does not change the fact they identify themselves as Hungarians - a nation of non Slavic ethnicity. If you mid so much that Bosniaks call themselves Bosniaks while you call them Muslim Croats, it is your problem. If their religious and regional identity is more important for them than their linguistic or other identities, it is only their choice and you have no right to criticize them. It is their identity.

I completely understand that it may hurt your national pride, as it makes your nation seem smaller, but it is your problem. They proved their will and ability to defend their Bosniak identity and convinced the world (or at least most of Europe) to respect it. I don't know why they should not have the right to call themselves the way they want. "Yugoslavs" of Croatia have chosen their Croat identity to be more important than other, "Muslim Croats" of Bosnia have chosen their Bosniak, there is no problem. I think the price they all paid was higher than high enough, so we should respect their choice.

domagoj
23 Mar 2009, 16:07
i am stupid