How will you force them?

[Mephon]

Hi,

I just read an article on gamona.de about the game and that you will find the Items in Multyplayermatches.

I thought about it and there might be an problem.

How will you force them to play and not just look for Items?

When the loser keep the Items he found, too, then why shouldn't he just look for them and don't fight?

If I have an 2 on 2 and the other one ist just looking for Items and isn't fighting, or is more looking then fighting, how will you provid me from being the real "looser" when he gets all the Items?

I think it would help if just the winner/winning teams get the Items and all found Items in the winning team will be split up by the number of defeated enemys.

regards

Mephon
(sorry for the bad english/ I'm german)

[phpBG]

Dude, I can't quote exactly, couse it was quite awhile ago, but I think I've read that the winner will receive the award.
I mean, if it's a reward, what's the point of all losers getting it?

[Frujin]

There are items on the ground and there ar ealso rewards for a victory. They are all items, but, to get the real things you need to win a real fight.

[Mephon]

So when I have an 2 on 2 and I just keep looking for items on the ground and my partner makes the fight (and win) I will get more reward than him?

[Frujin]

No. There are several types of items (or, let's say, several sources of items). For example, the items you find on the ground counts for the entire team. Let me give you an example:

You play 3v3 game and you are playig as 2 Human + 1 Tribes. Lets imagine one of the human players takes one item from the ground. Then he receives it, other human will receive the exacly same item, and the tribes player will get a tribes item of the same level quality.

After the game is finished, the winning team, depending on many parameters, will receive additionally a special rewards in forms of more items.

[Mephon]

ok that sounds very cool.

[phpBG]

Yeah, that's even better than I imagined. :cool:
Let's see now...
Frujin actually said something specific. :p
Well, that hasn't happened in a long time, plus, that's the second time he does. :D
Suspecting we're about to get quite much more info soon. :cool: (just speculations, ofcource... :rolleyes: )

[IWM]

The 2nd time?
I suspect it was 3rd time?
Anyway I quite hope that your speculation got real...

[phpBG]

:D OK, maybe 3rd. :p

[jediguardian]

The guy with the FAQ should add this into his thread.

[phpBG]

Yeap, couse that's a question, even with the simplest answer.
I'll look for him

[Frankoman]

I have added it. Sorry for being a little slow on it! I also added a few more questions if you would like to look (4 others besides these I believe)